Live
Loading prices…
Internet Computer (ICP) logo
Internet Computer · ICP

Internet Computer Investment Calculator

What would buying ICP have been worth? Pick a plan and a start date and this replays it against real daily Internet Computer closes.

The plan

Strategy
Loading price history…
Our networkFree calculators48 free calculators — no signupFinance, health, conversions and everyday math. Instant answers, nothing to install.Open CalcLumen

What ICP actually did, in the data this page replays

Measured from the 1,952 daily closes this page replays — 11 May 2021 to 13 September 2026, from Binance. Figures are bounded by that window, not by the asset’s whole life.

History available5 years and 4 months (from Binance)
Bought on the first day, held to the last0.007× — a loss of 99.3%
Highest close in this window$364.01 on 11 May 2021
Where it sits against that high99.3% below
Deepest fall−99.4%, 11 May 2021 → 1 August 2026
Time to get back to that peakstill below it
Separate falls of 50% or more1
Days spent more than 20% below a previous peak99.8%
Best calendar year2023: +230.4%
Worst calendar year2022: -84.6%
Annualised volatility109.6%

ICP year by year

First close to last close each year. 2021 and 2026 are partial — the data starts mid-2021 and 2026 is still running.

YearChangeNote
2021-93.3%partial year
2022-84.6%worst full year
2023+230.4%best full year
2024-23.6%
2025-72.9%
2026-9.4%partial year

The part the calculator does not show you

Internet Computer has a particular shape in this data: its highest close is the very first one we hold, on 11 May 2021, and the 99.4% fall from it is not an event inside the series — it is the series. Any start date you pick above sits somewhere on that decline, which is why almost every plan you can configure here comes back negative. That is not a flaw in the backtest. It is what buying and holding ICP over this window did.

109.6% annualised volatility is ordinary for a major crypto asset and still several times a stock index. All ICP calculators →

Frequently asked questions

Would buying ICP on the first day of this data and holding have made money?

No. Held across the whole window the position ended at 0.007× — a loss of 99.3%. That is worth stating plainly because "hold long enough and it recovers" is the usual advice, and over the 5 years and 4 months we hold for ICP it did not happen.

What is the worst ICP has fallen?

99.4% in this data, from 11 May 2021 down to 1 August 2026 — 5 years and 3 months of falling. It has not returned to that peak since, so anyone who bought at the top is still waiting. Bear in mind our ICP series starts in 2021; a deeper fall before that date would not appear here.

How much time does ICP spend below its previous high?

99.8% of all days in this window sat more than 20% below a previous peak. Put another way, for most of the time you would have owned it, the screen showed a number lower than one you had already seen — which is the part of a backtest's headline return that the headline never conveys.

What were ICP's best and worst years?

2023 was the best at +230.4%, and 2022 the worst at -84.6%. The gap between those two is the reason a single average annual return is a poor description of this asset: almost nobody experiences the average, they experience one of the two extremes depending on when they bought.

Is 5 years and 4 months of data enough to trust this backtest?

Reasonably. 5 years and 4 months spans roughly one full cycle for ICP — enough for the drawdown figure to mean something, not enough to call it a pattern. The assets here with a decade or more behind them support firmer conclusions.

What to keep in mind for ICP

ICP fell more than 95% from its first-day price and remains sensitive to unlock schedules and to NNS governance decisions.

Users of ICP apps generally pay nothing, because the canister covers computation from its cycle balance — a genuinely different model from paying gas per action.

A backtest is one path that already happened. It shows what this plan produced through the exact sequence of prices ICP went through — not what a similar plan will produce through a sequence nobody has seen yet.