Live
Loading prices…
Render (RENDER) logo
Render · RENDER

Render Investment Calculator

What would buying RENDER have been worth? Pick a plan and a start date and this replays it against real daily Render closes.

The plan

Strategy
Loading price history…
Our networkFree calculators48 free calculators — no signupFinance, health, conversions and everyday math. Instant answers, nothing to install.Open CalcLumen

What RENDER actually did, in the data this page replays

Measured from the 780 daily closes this page replays — 26 July 2024 to 13 September 2026, from Binance. Figures are bounded by that window, not by the asset’s whole life.

History available2 years and 2 months (from Binance)
Bought on the first day, held to the last0.203× — a loss of 79.7%
Highest close in this window$10.48 on 6 December 2024
Where it sits against that high86.8% below
Deepest fall−88.4%, 6 December 2024 → 18 December 2025
Time to get back to that peakstill below it
Separate falls of 50% or more1
Days spent more than 20% below a previous peak90.9%
Best calendar year2025: -82.1%
Annualised volatility99.1%

RENDER year by year

First close to last close each year. 2024 and 2026 are partial — the data starts mid-2024 and 2026 is still running.

YearChangeNote
2024+0.2%partial year
2025-82.1%best full year
2026-0.4%partial year

The part the calculator does not show you

Held from the first day in this data to the last, RENDER returned 0.203× — a loss of 79.7%. Long holding periods are usually presented as the thing that rescues a volatile asset, and over this particular window for this particular coin, they did not. It is worth setting the calculator above to the full range and seeing that result written out before assuming time fixes an entry.

The deepest fall took RENDER down 88.4%, from $10.48 on 6 December 2024 to $1.21 on 18 December 202512 months of falling. RENDER has not been back to that peak since. Anyone who bought on 6 December 2024 is still waiting, 13 months later — which is the scenario a backtest showing a positive average return quietly averages away.

Note that RENDER's best calendar year in this window is still a negative one (2025, -82.1%). There is no year in the data where holding it for the twelve months made money.

99.1% annualised volatility is ordinary for a major crypto asset and still several times a stock index. All RENDER calculators →

Frequently asked questions

Would buying RENDER on the first day of this data and holding have made money?

No. Held across the whole window the position ended at 0.203× — a loss of 79.7%. That is worth stating plainly because "hold long enough and it recovers" is the usual advice, and over the 2 years and 2 months we hold for RENDER it did not happen.

What is the worst RENDER has fallen?

88.4% in this data, from 6 December 2024 down to 18 December 2025 — 12 months of falling. It has not returned to that peak since, so anyone who bought at the top is still waiting. Bear in mind our RENDER series starts in 2024; a deeper fall before that date would not appear here.

How much time does RENDER spend below its previous high?

90.9% of all days in this window sat more than 20% below a previous peak. Put another way, for most of the time you would have owned it, the screen showed a number lower than one you had already seen — which is the part of a backtest's headline return that the headline never conveys.

Is 2 years and 2 months of data enough to trust this backtest?

Partly. 2 years and 2 months covers real bull and bear conditions for RENDER but not a full cycle end to end, so the extremes above are better guides than the average. Coins on this site with longer records give more meaningful answers.

What to keep in mind for RENDER

RENDER trades as an AI and GPU-demand proxy, which has made it move on Nvidia earnings and AI news rather than on rendering volume.

On Solana a RENDER transfer costs a fraction of a cent; the legacy Ethereum version costs Ethereum gas, so check which one you hold before moving it.

A backtest is one path that already happened. It shows what this plan produced through the exact sequence of prices RENDER went through — not what a similar plan will produce through a sequence nobody has seen yet.